This section of the website provides a brief insight into some of the concepts involved in quality and the history of quality improvement.
This section addresses what we mean by quality. After reading this, you may wish to read the next section which considers what is meant by the term quality improvement.
Introduction
Quality is a term IF uses to describe and assess an array of characteristics of a diverse range of physical goods and intangible services. According to Garvin (1988) there are five common definitions of, or approaches to, quality:
In the context of tangible products, Garvin (1991) listed eight criteria of quality: performance, features, reliability, conformance, durability, serviceability, aesthetics, and perceived quality. However, this is not sufficient for quality when related to services. To define quality of services, Evans & Lindsay (2005) described a different eight criteria: time, timeliness, completeness, courtesy, consistency, accessibility and convenience, accuracy, and responsiveness.
The contemporary view of quality places the user (consumer, client or customer) in a central role (Crosby, 1995). We need to understand the needs of the user if we are to successfully deliver services that will fulfil their needs. It is recognised that up to 85 per cent of quality issues are the result of systemic factors beyond the control of individual workers (Deming, 1994) hence the need to carefully review the processes involved. Another important idea is that all areas of an organisation contribute to the final quality of the services and products produced (Juran, 1988).
One of the first to define quality in health was Donabedian. He described quality in terms of structure, process and outcome (Donabedian, 1966). Maxwell described six dimensions of quality: accessibility, equity, appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency and social acceptability (Maxwell, 1992).
In 1996, Ovretveit provided a description which appears to be the most encompassing. He described quality as having three elements: client quality, professional quality and management quality.
Benchmarking
"Benchmarking is a self-improvement tool for organisations. It allows them to compare themselves with others, to identify their comparative strengths and weaknesses, and learn how to improve. Benchmarking is a way of finding and adopting best practices." (Association of Commonwealth Universities, 2007).
Sometimes benchmarking seems to lack the learning element and so becomes performance management. Our approach to quality improvement and benchmarking is that "Measurement for improvement is not measurement for judgment." (Berwick, 1998).
Quality assurance
Quality assurance is a process to ensure that the quality of a product or a service meets a predetermined standard. The process of quality assurance compares the quality of a product or service with a minimum standard, often set by some external authority. The aim in quality assurance is to ensure that a product or service is fit for purpose (Cole, 1998).
Quality improvement
Quality improvement is concerned with continually raising the quality of a product or service. It is concerned with comparing the quality of the service that is about to be produced, with the quality of what has been produced in the past. Quality improvement is therefore primarily concerned with self or one's team, rather than external bodies (Inglis, 2005).
In summary, quality in public services is a concept that is difficult to clearly define but is essentially about improving the user's experience, along with efficient use of resources.
If you'd like to find out more about quality improvement, Click here.
Click here to download the bibliography of Quality Improvement methods and tools referred to on this site.
Last Updated 27 October 2011
The Model for Improvement provides a framework for developing, testing and implementing changes. It helps to break down a change effort into small, manageable chunks which are then tested to ensure that things are improving and that no effort is wasted. It is always worth remembering that while every improvement is certainly a change, every change is not an improvement.
The Model for Improvement consists of two equal parts; the first part, the “thinking part”, consists of three fundamental questions to guide improvement work:
For more information about the Model for Improvement visit: http://apcc.org.au/about_the_APCC/the_model_for_improvement/
Adapted from the Institute of Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series Collaborative methodology, in the Australian context, the Collaborative methodology is used as a framework for the APCC Program. This methodology has been applied to a wide range of management challenges. Originally applied to healthcare systems in the USA, it has since been adopted in other countries, including the UK, Scotland, Canada and New Zealand.
The Collaborative methodology is proven to be highly effective in achieving large scale systems change and demonstrating measurable outcomes. It provides a generic quality improvement model that can be applied to achieve incremental, rapid and locally relevant improvements across a broad range of clinical and practice business issues.